Asus B85M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-F (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150213
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 220 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 439 57% 429 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 41.5 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 42.8 34% 38.7 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 39 Splatting 36.8 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Revuahn 900G 240GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: R052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 290 10 34 10 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 407 Write 347 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 71.1 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 92%
Samsung HD503HI 499GB 109GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 114 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 102 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.43 MB/s

ipTIME External 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 888GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 27.8 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 28.3 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 161%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKH800UD51208-1600 2x8GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.3 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-F Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-F

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	34x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	18x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	15x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	29x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	14x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x

RAM
9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 1,746 samples	9x
DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 838 samples	6x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16