PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 15.4 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100406 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 10:54 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
48.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
|
7.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335u
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 71 68 79 82 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
78GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 68 67 67 MB/s
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
74GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 69 72 68 80 83 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 536x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 489x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |