Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160406
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 93.6 48% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 185 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.1% Average	Lighting 48.9 Reflection 49.1 Parallax 40.4 40% 46.1 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 47.7 44% 54 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB 2,727 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 32 72 37 14 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 346 Write 138 Mixed 267 SusWrite 45.4 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 20.5 76% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 22.2 DQ Mixed 17.3 37% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 153GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 115 125 121 111 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 131 Mixed 26 SusWrite 120 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 103%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 36GB free Firmware: LV011C SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 32 33 33 33 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 56.2 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 33.3 32% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 CML8GX3M1A160 CMZ8GX3M2A160 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20% Poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 2.2 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	11x
GP-ASM2NE2256GTTDR 256GBGigabyteBench 158%, 4,456 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 445 samples	7x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $303

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16