HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '17 at 18:17
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 200
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 524
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 34.1
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 27
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 954
Write 936
Mixed 945
211% 945 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 19.7
101% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 114
136% 239 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 139%
Great: 166%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
464GB free
Firmware: BXW74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,620
369% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 51.8
178% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 149
175% 303 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 237%
Great: 262%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 956
Write 661
Mixed 806
180% 808 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 15.9
95% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 17.1
22% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST300MP0035 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: HPS0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 243
Mixed 227
179% 238 MB/s
4K Read 2.77
4K Write 5.41
4K Mixed 0.74
297% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%
Seagate ST300MP0035 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: HPS0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 239
Mixed 244
182% 241 MB/s
4K Read 3.11
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.86
320% 3.02 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 137%
Great: 140%
Seagate ST300MP0035 300GB
260GB free
Firmware: HPS0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 243
Mixed 222
177% 236 MB/s
4K Read 2.73
4K Write 5.26
4K Mixed 0.83
303% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 139%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 28.6
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback