Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4-F (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '20 at 11:22
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 664 69% 556 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 51.4 Parallax 55.3 37% 50.8 fps	MRender 51 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 36.8 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
AMD T00 StoreMI 1TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 857GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 192 192 192 191 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.1% Very poor	Read 107 Write 146 Mixed 113 SusWrite 192 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 4% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 96%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 380GB free, PID 0408 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 103 100 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 102 Write 68 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 101 107% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 42%
General UDisk 134GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 125GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 10 3.6 9.6 8.5 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 20.7 Write 3 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 7.8 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Mixed 0 57% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FADG 2x4GB 454 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 31.4 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 27.5 78% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	428x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	371x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $140Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	98x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	128x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	120x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	118x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	63x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	109x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	93x
3200 C16 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 42,084 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $363

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16