Toshiba Satellite M645

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite M645 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PBQAA
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '17 at 23:16
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	KWT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 131 59% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 181 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FC81) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2255 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.31 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 64 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 58483144	74.9% Very good	Read 482 Write 476 Mixed 429 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 15.7 70% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 51.8 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 38.7 55% 96 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite M645 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite M645

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	11x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	6x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	21x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	5x
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	4x
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 80CE M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBKingstonBench 24%, 4 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16