Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 10:50
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 543
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 47.3
48% 53.5 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 50.5
40% 49 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 960GB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSC010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 340 408 408 422 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 280
Write 104
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 377
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 11.4
54% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 231
136% 136 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54%
Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
284GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 137 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 186
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 137
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
8GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 32.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 17.1
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
194GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 2.4
30% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 36%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB
379GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.8
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 2.2
31% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA HDWD120 2TB
84GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 37
Write 34
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 17.2
41% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $362
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback