| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110429 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '20 at 20:59 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
68.5%
Good
|
68% 113 Pts
|
38% 289 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.9%
Average
|
49% 60.5 fps
|
48% 60.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 146 84 80 80 74 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
37% 167 MB/s
|
86% 28.5 MB/s
|
82% 109 MB/s
|
|
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
154GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 65 65 63 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
45% 60.9 MB/s
|
101% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR3 1600G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26%
Poor
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
20% 6.97 GB/s
|
58% 69.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,448 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 703x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 378x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 124x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 111x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 99x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 78x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $989 |