Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 15:23
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 80
2-Core 163
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 309
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 88.8
58% 77.1 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 57.7
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 434 441 466 461 466 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 476
Write 434
Mixed 304
SusWrite 452
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 23.7
98% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 273
214% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
809GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 465 464 467 466 467 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 474
Mixed 456
SusWrite 466
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 44.7
156% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 152 157 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 154
Write 154
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 153
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88%
Great: 101%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 11.7
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
852GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 4.4 3.4 3 3.7 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 31
Write 5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 5.3
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback