Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 20 '20 at 15:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 154
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 458
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 63
Parallax 97.1
60% 77.7 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 78.3
58% 69 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 148 52 114 97 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 476
Write 402
Mixed 335
SusWrite 125
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 25.3
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 127
125% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
186GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 260 143 144 136 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 492
Write 441
Mixed 384
SusWrite 196
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.6
146% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 71
85% 153 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 122%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$38
597GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 149 148 146 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 148
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback