Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '20 at 07:45
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 592 61% 491 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4250 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 55.2 49% 60.8 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 55 Splatting 63.9 51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
USB3.0 480GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 268GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 205 102 290 264 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 340 Write 339 Mixed 287 SusWrite 220 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 23.5 80% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 116 90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 75%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1650 Write 1,012 Mixed 707 247% 1,123 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 70.3 245% 85.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,058 DQ Write 925 DQ Mixed 901 700% 961 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
USB3.0 480GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 27GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 44 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 293 Write 261 Mixed 238 SusWrite 42.9 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 20 67% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 84.9 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 70.4 54% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 75%
Jmicron Generic 256GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 13GB free Firmware: 4103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 38 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 36.6 8% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 8.4 33% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 19.6 DQ Mixed 18.6 14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 78%
Terra Master DAS 750GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 481GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 34 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 120 Write 112 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 32.7 63% 85 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 56%
Terra Master DAS 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 437GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 42 41 42 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 207 Write 125 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 41.1 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.3 332% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 106%
Terra Master DAS 750GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 685GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 136 Write 128 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 32.8 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 56%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 2TB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 35GB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 73.8 Write 72.3 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 19.9 73% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 56%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 2TB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 106 Write 98.5 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 21 89% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 1,580 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 26 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 24 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,070x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,452x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	822x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,765x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16