Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 10:05
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 180
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 496
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 69
Parallax 62.6
53% 65.4 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 57.3
52% 64 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 180GB-$395
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 96 72 53 72 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 156
Write 180
Mixed 209
SusWrite 85.1
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 15.7
68% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 16.6
51% 108 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 87%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
143GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 209 176 54 56 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 235
Write 302
Mixed 271
SusWrite 126
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 23.4
80% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 26.1
47% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2666 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,010
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback