PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2215 |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140702 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '20 at 10:23 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 75% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-6800B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 92 71 92 95 87 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10 PRO-7800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 43%, 1,083 samples | 48x |
A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 1,989 samples | 19x |
A8-6500B APUAMDBench 52%, 1,094 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 41x |
Radeon R7AMDBench 5%, 539 samples | 7x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |