Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 23:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 646
63% 519 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 128
Parallax 122
97% 123 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 117
Splatting 98.4
84% 102 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
712GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 466 459 476 478 479 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 474
Mixed 425
SusWrite 467
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 38.7
140% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 112 120 130 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 155
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 120
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 10 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Read 25
Write 2.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 11.2
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2800 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2800 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback