Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	4.71% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1700MHz 8 User benchmarks, average bench 25% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 12 2-Core 11.6 26% 30.1 Pts	4-Core 9.8 8-Core 12.6 2% 11.2 Pts	64-Core 13.9 1% 13.9 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS32GSSD25-M 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: V090216 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 469 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 100 0 (E5) Unknown 100 0 -21488961530388 (E8) Unknown 100 48 4639389986873 (E9) Unknown 100 0 3303290241281 (EA) Unknown 100 0 210503782402 (EB) Unknown 100 0 604298303	4.71% Terrible	Read 53.2 Write 28 Mixed 27.9 8% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.69 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.37 3% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.5% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 0.8 MC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.07 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16