Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka) 1,069 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 74.6 39% 61 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 104 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 1,187 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 5110) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 4.62 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 6.83 4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 274 282 284 287 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 371 Write 336 Mixed 300 SusWrite 286 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 39.3 130% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 155 117% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.1% Poor	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 32%, 1,069 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,187 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GBHynixBench 29%, 57 samples	1x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16