Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 94 2-Core 180 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 411 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8418) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.64 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 2.52 3% 3.25 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 106 108 100 115 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 472 Write 269 Mixed 378 SusWrite 110 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 41 132% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 251 220% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 613GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 114 Write 71.2 Mixed 62 SusWrite 111 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 185% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1333EL Series Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 1333EL Series Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16