Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 119 56% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 262 29% 230 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 54.1 36% 46.6 fps	MRender 55.1 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 38.5 38% 48.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM841 2.5" 256GB 1,340 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT03D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 80 58 58 55 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 461 Write 156 Mixed 153 SusWrite 69.1 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 23.4 98% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 51.9 62% 115 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 80%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 176GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 149 Write 133 Mixed 88 SusWrite 110 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 68GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 72.9 71% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 27GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 78 77 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 84.3 Write 87.8 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 77.3 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 12GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 89 90 88 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 112 Write 93.5 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 88.6 68% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 76%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 51GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.3 0.8 0.8 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 76.8 Write 80.7 Mixed 60 SusWrite 1.3 70% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 53%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 111GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 116 116 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 114 135% 99 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 53%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 112GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 80 81 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 102 Write 78.8 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 80.2 103% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 24GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 116 116 116 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 72.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 59 SusWrite 114 112% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.9 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $439

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16