Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 38.9 2-Core 80.8 30% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 85.1 8-Core 78.8 11% 81.9 Pts	64-Core 82.9 5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.03 1% 1.42 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 1.04 2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ngff 2242 120GB SSD 46 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0411A SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 57 57 57 54 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 378 Write 334 Mixed 106 SusWrite 60.8 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 8.8 43% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 25.3 50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 88%
SDXC Card 197GB 961 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 90GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 12 12 14 16 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 22.4 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 12.1 23% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 2 slots used 3GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.9 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16