Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 200 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 487 52% 416 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8.5TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 8TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.3 1.3 1 0.7 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 1.2 Mixed 2 SusWrite 1.1 2% 1.95 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 200%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G6K1 3x2GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3 of 8 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.4% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	496x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	305x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16