TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 110
56% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 324
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 55.8%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.50.23.01
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 7.28
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 6.08%
 Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-SM4V2-512G-SBC 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMA613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 324 97 102 99 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.5% Good
Read 453
Write 392
Mixed 342
SusWrite 182
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 25.8
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 146
118% 165 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 10 12 18 10 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 6
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 12
15% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 8.12%
 Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 44.6%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples1,027x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples964x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples911x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples483x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples462x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples334x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples175x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples150x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples356x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback