ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '17 at 17:17
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 40.9 32% 43 Pts	4-Core 40.6 8-Core 40.6 5% 40.6 Pts	64-Core 40.7 2% 40.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 Series 178 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E140) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 0.94 2% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galaxy GX0240ML105-G 256GB 422 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2246 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2025 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2228227 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 182 182 4323803443 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 367 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	56.9% Above average	Read 257 Write 216 Mixed 196 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 20 89% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 29.2 55% 109 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback