Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G620-$30 12,899 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 62 2-Core 116 49% 81.4 Pts	4-Core 98.6 8-Core 114 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 809F) 1GB CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 0.31 1% 1.28 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 1.65 2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 7.5 8 7.8 7.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1,281 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 7.2 232% 324 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 2,862% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TBSeagateBench 112%, 7,008 samples	3x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	3x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	3x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16