Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 16 '17 at 04:08
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 241
92% 160 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 783
82% 660 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Asus(1043 8385) 1.5GB
CLim: 782 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 35
Parallax 27.3
21% 29.4 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 32.7
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
54GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 463
Write 257
Mixed 294
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 20.7
124% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 62.3
100% 192 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 396
Mixed 416
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 46.7
171% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 107
138% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 165
Mixed 150
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.21
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: GU001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 55.4
Mixed 51.9
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CT4G4DFS8213.8FA11 Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 CT4G4DFS8213.8FA11 Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback