Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 83.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 283 92% 169 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 888 85% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,065 66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.3% Average	Lighting 60.5 Reflection 66 Parallax 60 49% 62.2 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 53.5 49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 1.8 46 48 70 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 443 Write 360 Mixed 274 SusWrite 45 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 14.1 34% 8.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 106%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 86GB free Firmware: 1.35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 64 77 79 74 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 148 Write 119 Mixed 137 SusWrite 75.6 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 21.7 72% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 109 86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 55%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 107GB free Firmware: 1.33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 56 57 56 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 192 Write 67.5 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 56.9 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 18.1 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 84.3 67% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 49%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 718GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 143 143 146 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 93 Write 103 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 144 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 109%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$33 2,177 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 993GB free Firmware: 01.01AX1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 90 91 92 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 170 Write 154 Mixed 103 SusWrite 90.2 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 93%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 874GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 37 36 36 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 33 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 35.4 46% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 149GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 32 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 35.2 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 32.8 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 16%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 426GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.88% Terrible	Read 39.3 Write 38.2 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 4.2 34% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x8GB 2,384 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 39.9 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 36.7 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,291x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,428x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,247x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16