Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H170M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151030
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 12:33
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 220 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 421 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 110 Parallax 92.9 81% 101 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 94.5 Splatting 92.7 77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 148 143 142 137 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 414 Mixed 336 SusWrite 169 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 45.7 165% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 44.5 97% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 399GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 125 126 126 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 141 Write 136 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 125 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB 3,837 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 723GB free Firmware: 0143 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 86 89 87 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 68 Write 44.1 Mixed 47.1 SusWrite 86.6 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-029.A00G Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.8% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 25.6 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	24x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	11x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	10x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	7x
SSD 64GBBench 53%, 250 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x
M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 70%, 136 samples	5x
9905625-030.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 1,777 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $411

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16