HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 04:03
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470S CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 185
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 354
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-128G-AAG 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 168 157 157 156 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 407
Write 197
Mixed 227
SusWrite 161
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 28.2
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 139
127% 199 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
785GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 25.1
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
10GB free, PID 00d4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.2 11 9.4 9.3 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 22.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8
19% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 11%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
786GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 23.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 22.4
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM51264BC1339.16FD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback