Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '20 at 21:06
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 878 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,245 77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6262) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 76.6 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 64.4 62% 71.5 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,924 Write 896 Mixed 545 244% 1,121 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 47.4 186% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 533 DQ Mixed 747 541% 709 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 121GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 314 314 313 314 312 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 449 Mixed 407 SusWrite 329 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 55.6 186% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 131 131 132 132 130 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.7% Very poor	Read 184 Write 77.8 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 129 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 1.1 15% 5.43 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 214GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 135 Write 121 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 106 68% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 556GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 137 135 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 89 Write 95.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 135 62% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 108%
WDC WD15 EADS-00P8B0 1.5TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 92.2 Write 91.8 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 0.6 77% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 32%
ST310003 33AS 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 700GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 99.7 Write 97.2 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 0.7 76% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 47%
WDC WD50 01AALS-00E3A0 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 463GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 131 131 132 132 131 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	Read 137 Write 134 Mixed 102 SusWrite 130 170% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 43.2 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 29.5 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 30.6 93% 32.4 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)