Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 02:23
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 45.5 2-Core 80.7 46% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 196 20% 163 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 82D5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.47 4% 3.48 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 2.83 3% 3.42 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 34C9) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	9.56% Terrible	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 9.65 Parallax 6.19 11% 9.64 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 7.35 8% 9.35 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.56% Great: 10%
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 82C7) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.78 2% 1.76 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 204 209 203 175 182 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 218 Write 209 Mixed 191 SusWrite 192 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 25.3 77% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 213 127% 129 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 297GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 207 210 204 200 205 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.1% Average	Read 217 Write 214 Mixed 194 SusWrite 202 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 25.3 82% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 47.4 38% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 133%
WDC WD40 PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.8 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 2.6 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 66%
WDC WD40 PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 15 15 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.8 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 13 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 66%
WDC WD40 PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.5 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 15.7 33% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 16.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	72x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	16x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	43x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	29x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16