Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.44% Terrible	Memory 12.3 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 39 13% 23.8 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 37.8 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 34.8 2% 34.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 10AD) 384MB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.982.7.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 144 28 30 129 72 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.6% Poor	Read 208 Write 180 Mixed 147 SusWrite 76 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 7.6 33% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 58.1 DQ Mixed 42.7 42% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 6GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 3.5 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 383 10% 383 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	1x
E-450 APUAMDBench 28%, 299 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	2x

SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 6GBSamsungBench 39%, 15 samples	1x
M2S2G64CB88G5N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 34%, 43 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16