| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock P67 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120424 |
| Uptime | 3.8 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '17 at 03:56 |
| Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
66.6%
Good
|
60% 93.5 Pts
|
32% 258 Pts
|
23% 370 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
14% 17.2 fps
|
18% 22.6 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.9%
Above average
|
55% 19.4 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
66% 60.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P67 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 250 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 - $170
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 78x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 53x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 20x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $639 |