Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus AM1M-A (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160401
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 10:56
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3 3,720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 63.6 34% 51 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 110 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8623) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3 2% 3.32 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.81 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Disk 120GB 499 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5098 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 368 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 125 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1703988 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4033	72.2% Very good	Read 498 Write 444 Mixed 482 106% 475 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 13.8 77% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 11.8 22% 42 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 72%
Seagate ST350052 6AS 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 198GB free Firmware: CC14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 205387617 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2167 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 23022055 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 655 (B7) Unknown 94 94 6 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 60130459932 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 521469983 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 237 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2662 (C2) HDA temperature 31 52 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 26 205387617 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 604 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 136640089560021 (F1) Unknown 100 253 581217334 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1228233625	53.1% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 93.6 Mixed 95 70% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.54 123% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 64%
Seagate ST3250312CS 250GB-$90 1,923 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 111GB free Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 119519425 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 4327846290 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10090 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 791 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 45 12885164113 (BD) vendor-specific 63 63 37 (BE) vendor-specific 75 51 471007257 (C2) HDA temperature 25 49 55834574873 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 46 119519425 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 815	41.8% Average	Read 74.5 Write 71.1 Mixed 64.4 53% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.45 99% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 62%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 119 Write 131 Mixed 117 159% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 7.62 4K Mixed 0.46 277% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 26,466 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $44

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	34x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	17x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 25%, 658 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	26x
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	6x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
SD8SN8U-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 75%, 1,494 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,528 samples	2x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GBCrucialBench 27%, 1,234 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $82

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16