HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory	11.8 GB free of 18.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	29 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '17 at 18:58
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530 771 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 57 2-Core 121 57% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 319 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 648 40% 648 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3166 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 108 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1820654432	58.9% Above average	Read 263 Write 198 Mixed 147 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 31.3 88% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 114 103% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 170 4366 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 223 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7902 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 223 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5879 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 125 Mixed 104 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.27 92% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 84%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 33GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 10.4 Mixed 12.6 19% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.58 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 ID:02 9E CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:02 9E CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 ID:02 9E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.7% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.7 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	144x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	99x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16