PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Aspire M3920 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire M3920 |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101217 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Apr 22 '17 at 21:29 |
Run Duration | 412 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 22,669,118 GHz (avg)
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 120GB-$91
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate M3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
|||
47%
Average
|
||||
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB
125GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
ST350041 8AS 500GB
34GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic SD/MMC 8GB
6GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.62%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 30x |
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 29x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |