WYSE DQ Class

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWYSE DQ Class  (all builds)
MotherboardInventec DQ Class
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 10:18
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-415GA SOC HD Graphics
Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 46.8
28% 41 Pts
4-Core 89.2
8-Core 86.9
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 91.8
6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330E
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.75 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
32gb SAT A Flash Drive 32GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFPS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 30 38 41 40 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Mass Storage Device 240GB
149GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 26 28 29 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 28.4
Write 19.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 27.2
33% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 5.2
453% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KNWMX1-ETB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ Class Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: WYSE DQ Class

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback