Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Memory 77 1-Core 146 2-Core 289 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1,118 100% 846 Pts	64-Core 2,016 125% 2,016 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.7% Good	Lighting 78.7 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 73.6 64% 80.5 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 78.7 Splatting 103 80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 217 265 378 394 238 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 2,316 Write 524 Mixed 1,670 SusWrite 368 268% 1,219 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 63.2 204% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 546 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 412 302% 403 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 355%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 753GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 99 101 101 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 604 Write 328 Mixed 581 SusWrite 101 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 21.9 88% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 174 135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 118%
Amd-raid Array 5 999GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 252% 866GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 99 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 765 Write 870 Mixed 644 SusWrite 101 133% 595 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 26.6 104% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 372 DQ Mixed 230 193% 273 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 476%
WD WD5000LUCT-63C26Y0 500GB 2,409 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 466GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 57 59 59 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 102 Write 96.4 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 58.2 54% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 2BA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 66 66 68 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 113 Write 89.5 Mixed 58 SusWrite 67.1 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 59%
Amd-raid Array 4 750GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 698GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 102 103 104 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 109 Write 105 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 103 70% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 3.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 2TB free Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	125% Outstanding	Read 421 Write 19.6 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 12.3 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.2 822% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 34.7 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.8 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 32.8 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $179Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16