Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 06:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,045
99% 819 Pts
64-Core 1,345
83% 1,345 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
135% 165 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 141
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HYUNDAI/120G 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 75 21 33 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 430
Write 56.2
Mixed 136
SusWrite 50.9
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 10.8
73% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 16.5
26% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 79%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
181GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 116 116 136 163 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 365
Mixed 364
SusWrite 164
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 43.5
161% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 164
120% 157 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 34.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback