Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	44.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 17:59
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 146 2-Core 286 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 953 88% 734 Pts	64-Core 1,364 84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.5% Outstanding	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 214 Parallax 265 52% 181 fps	MRender 288 Gravity 241 Splatting 174 185% 234 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164 35,257 User benchmarks, average bench 314% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,014 Write 3,405 Mixed 2,081 563% 2,500 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 61.7 230% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,334 DQ Write 996 DQ Mixed 1,108 844% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 22GB free Firmware: RKT303.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,322 Write 1,163 Mixed 825 245% 1,104 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 31.4 156% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 60.3 DQ Write 1,114 DQ Mixed 1,278 784% 817 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 303%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 109GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 149 88 88 89 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 403 Write 137 Mixed 243 SusWrite 114 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.4 42% 10 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 364GB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 43 43 43 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 91.2 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 42.5 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 124GB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 61.8 Write 91.8 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 41 52% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 224% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 98 101 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 111 Write 146 Mixed 111 SusWrite 99.6 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 404% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 99 100 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 413GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 102 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 102 139% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 127% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x16GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 41.3 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 36.6 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,412x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,236x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,468x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16