Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 62.4 2-Core 71.4 45% 67.1 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 127 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.77 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.G SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 168 104 150 136 149 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.6% Average	Read 209 Write 201 Mixed 194 SusWrite 152 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 16.6 55% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 130 110% 162 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 180GB free, PID 0201 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 21 22 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 19.1 Mixed 17 SusWrite 22.3 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.4 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	70x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $270

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16