PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111110 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '20 at 07:25 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
75.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
HP(103C 0936) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28
|
3.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 29 45 38 38 49 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 685x |
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 593x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |