Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 110 50% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 340 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85C7) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 31.9 27% 32.9 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 22.9 24% 30.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 246 Mixed 227 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 18.6 78% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 29.8 56% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16