Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 173 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 322 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 3003) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.6 5% 3.9 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 2.9 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 253GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0810B SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 410 409 413 414 413 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 391 Write 412 Mixed 350 SusWrite 410 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 33.4 114% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 205 179% 263 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 9905584-003.A00LF 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,087 samples	8x
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 24GBUnknownBench 51%, 6 samples	5x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 1,020 samples	4x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16