HP Compaq 6730b (FY266UC#ABC)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6730b (FY266UC#ABC) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30DD
Memory	0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration	476 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 62 36% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 60.7 8-Core 66.3 8% 63.5 Pts	64-Core 67.1 4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS723216L9A360 160GB-$69 659 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC2OC60D Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 4.2 Mixed 6 4% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 44%
ST1000VM 002-1CT162 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 517GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.07% Terrible	Read 29 Write 20 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 14.5 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 15%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.3 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 3.1 10% 8.97 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.7 5.8 5.1 5.7 5.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.5 7% 5.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 8%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 4 1.7 2.7 3.8 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 2.8 4% 3.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 1.4 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16