PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 056851U (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
Memory | 16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130201 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '20 at 17:07 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 121 85 103 92 87 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
280GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 126 127 128 126 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Monster MONSTER DIGITAL 32GB
29GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 13 12 8.1 8.1 8.1 MB/s
|
9.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 20x |
Xeon E5-1660 0IntelBench 76%, 1,746 samples | 3x |
Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000DNvidiaBench 6%, 684 samples | 4x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 3x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |