Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 268
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 967
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,540
95% 1,540 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 145
Parallax 131
108% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,529
Write 6,478
Mixed 6,047
1,419% 6,351 MB/s
4K Read 724
4K Write 404
4K Mixed 361
1,773% 496 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,098
826% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
190GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 308 308 308 307 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 460
Mixed 401
SusWrite 323
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 47.5
166% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 431 432 430 430 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 446
Mixed 404
SusWrite 430
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 44
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 304
243% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 431 431 433 431 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 447
Mixed 406
SusWrite 430
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 43.6
151% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 305
244% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 431 434 431 431 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 447
Mixed 405
SusWrite 430
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 44.7
154% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 304
243% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 30
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 30.6
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 11.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback