Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '20 at 23:34
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 252 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 1,075 95% 807 Pts	64-Core 1,698 105% 1,698 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 114 Parallax 103 86% 108 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 104 Splatting 101 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Svbus Virtual Hard Disk SCSI RAM Device 1GB 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 2,170 Write 2,162 Mixed 2,170 485% 2,167 MB/s	4K Read 112 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 111 370% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 124 94% 124 MB/s

Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 16GB free Firmware: K3110310 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,287 Write 285 Mixed 467 147% 679 MB/s	4K Read 324 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 220 862% 238 MB/s	DQ Read 1,310 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 18.7 213% 534 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB 12,662 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 327GB free Firmware: VB411D45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 869 545 115 367 314 277 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 571 Write 1,018 Mixed 384 SusWrite 414 135% 597 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 218 4K Mixed 99.8 276% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,319 DQ Write 962 DQ Mixed 1,462 1,005% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 330%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 325GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 475 475 473 476 475 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 371 Write 20.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 473 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 66.2 193% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 296 240% 341 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 123%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 912GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 152GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 616 723 356 227 208 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 441 Write 166 Mixed 427 SusWrite 482 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 41.8 169% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 603 DQ Mixed 318 285% 420 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 146%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB 542 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 126GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 886 864 878 552 350 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,071 Write 914 Mixed 614 SusWrite 736 187% 834 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 66.1 228% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 472 DQ Write 627 DQ Mixed 502 392% 534 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 183%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 51.2 MC Mixed 30.4 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 10 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $654Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)