MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory41.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 16:37
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 311
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 924
94% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 176
Parallax 134
109% 148 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
111% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1784 1527 1188 1035 983 909 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 1,939
Mixed 1,419
SusWrite 1,238
404% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 84
299% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,139
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 1,028
777% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 321%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
105GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 356 356 359 352 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 353
Mixed 318
SusWrite 357
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 45.9
149% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 214
154% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
755GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 132 131 131 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 142
Write 101
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 130
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 131 110 124 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 92.8
Write 126
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 125
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
435GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 190
Write 149
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 97.6
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 25.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 24.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback