Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67OW
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180410
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 178 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 347 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1205 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 31.7 20% 29.6 fps	MRender 26.7 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 22 19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHFR200240G 240GB 2,078 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000056R8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 119 121 122 119 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 475 Write 440 Mixed 383 SusWrite 150 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 31 101% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 55.9 DQ Mixed 34.9 29% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 96%
Toshiba MK1234GSX 119GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 110GB free Firmware: AH001D SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 32 31 31 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 21.7 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 30.9 19% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.3 3 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.2 6% 5.65 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.6% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 45%, 33 samples	2x
99U5471-028.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 769 samples	1x
99U5474-028.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 3,493 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16