Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161202
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 13:55
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 94.1 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 165 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 679 63% 525 Pts	64-Core 1,003 62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.1% Very good	Lighting 87.8 Reflection 96.7 Parallax 106 72% 96.7 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 106 Splatting 103 85% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 554 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 209 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 90 (C2) HDA temperature 73 61 167504969755	62% Good	Read 496 Write 273 Mixed 211 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 6.61 65% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 35 61% 121 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 99%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 931GB free Firmware: 04.06A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 192 3191 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1561 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4608 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1344 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 153 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1407 (C2) HDA temperature 127 109 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	97.2% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 130 Mixed 158 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.55 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.28 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 117%
Seagate IronWolf 1TB (2016)-$57 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 672GB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 65 88166201 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 876698 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 577 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 228 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 65 471138328 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 523 (C2) HDA temperature 24 18 77309411352 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 13 8 88166201 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83% Excellent	Read 139 Write 150 Mixed 72.3 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.17 84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 98%
Volume1 2TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 45.3 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 44.9 127% 44.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 16 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	528x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $864

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16