Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 13:14
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 186 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 461 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.6% Very good	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 89.1 Parallax 93.2 81% 93.8 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 85.9 Splatting 78.8 74% 92.9 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 190 188 184 218 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 389 Write 390 Mixed 312 SusWrite 213 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 29.8 100% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 336 253% 338 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 124%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 600GB free Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 1222 1275 987 1020 843 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1228 Write 1,097 Mixed 956 SusWrite 1,085 246% 1,092 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 50.2 164% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 797 DQ Mixed 430 452% 749 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 311%
WD WD20EVDS-63T3B0 2TB 919 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 211GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 44 53 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 46 Write 49.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 49.6 32% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	499x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	356x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	276x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $792

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16